Urban Planning Attacked by Idiocy

I read an article today on Treehugger about the anti-Agenda 21 people. Usually, I like to avoid such crazy talk, especially in an election year when the crazy is all around, but I feel compelled to address some things because it’s too ridiculous not to address.

No one is trying to take away your private property, or force you to give up your McMansion or house in the country for an urban mixed-use development. No one’s going to come into your home to round you up and put you on light rail trains and bicycles to transport you to the nearest city to toil in an urban garden and live close to your child’s school. Put down the Kool Aid, Captain Kooky; you’re getting your panties in a knot for nothing.

Bikes on the streets of Tokyo

Yet there are people who are convinced that this will happen. They’re all in a tizzy because the evil United Nations created the equally evil Agenda 21, a completely voluntary set of guidelines for sustainable development to improve the lives of people, particularly those who live in cities as much the world does. I’m not entirely sure what the anti-Agenda 21 zealots are smoking, but they need to get a refund from their dealer…or turn off the Faux News and maybe read something that isn’t from the John Birch bookshelf.

Mixed use development isn’t the enemy; neither are bike lanes, urban centers, light rail, high speed trains, pedestrian walkways or being in close proximity to work, school and your basic consumer needs. If you’re scared that your small town will turn into a ghost town, it’s not because of highway exits or propaganda to lure young folks and families away, it’s probably because there are no jobs. There are no jobs because your community is probably going through an economic shift to keep up with the times and citizens aren’t starting new businesses and/or established businesses aren’t interested in setting up shop. People go where the jobs are and if that means moving away from their hometowns, so be it. That’s been happening since the beginning of civilization. It’s nothing new and it’s certainly not a new Commie agenda.

Although the 5th amendment of the Constitution puts limits on eminent domain, the government can take your property and use it to expand a roadway, for example, so long as they adequately compensate your for it (e.g., give you fair market value for the land). They can’t take it away to build a mixed use development; however, they may do so to expand a light rail line or expand the roadway to add a new lane or a bike lane, basically anything that is for public use. This is also nothing new. Growing up in New Hampshire, people would constantly get all riled up about the Man trying to take away their property. Calm down, son. You can keep your weeds and dirt lawn, as well as your collection of cars on blocks and assorted lawn ornaments…until your road needs to be expanded, which if no one’s coming to your town anyway, really won’t be a problem.

While public comment is always welcome when new development or plans are on the table, it should at least take the form of informed opinion, not fear mongering. Blocking plans because you fear that someone will take away your SUV and house is irrational. As is threatening planners because some ignorant paranoid talking head, who has issues that a black man is president (clutch your pearls!), told you that all planners are part of some Communist U.N. conspiracy to take away all of your rights and make you wear utilitarian garments straight out of 1984. If you believe that, I have some magic beans to sell you real cheap—only $500,000 a bean. It’s the deal of the century. Did I mention they’re magic?

It’s true, trends in urban planning are moving towards walkable mixed-use communities with tree-lined streets, bike lanes and nearby schools, shopping and employment opportunities. I know it’s crazy, but it’s what people want, just look at the latest NAR Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers. Who wants to continue to commute 30 minutes each way five days a week to and from a home that they paid too much for during the boom, and are now underwater on, that’s located far from pretty much everything? Sure, there are some people who will say, “That’s my dream because it’s my property!” Good for them. For the rest of us, after a few years that luster will fade and you’ll be as fat , unhealthy and unhappy as the other commuters on the road. Perhaps some fresh air (fresh thanks in part to those ‘evil’ environmental laws enacted during the 1970s when rivers and the air were ablaze from reactions of toxic chemicals) would do you good.

One thought on “Urban Planning Attacked by Idiocy

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s